Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 05:12

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What pet would you strongly not recommend?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
If people in the UK hate Trump so much, why does he own golf courses there?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Do people really have sex with animals?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
'Alligator Alcatraz': Florida building migrant detention centre in Everglades - BBC
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
What would explain Trump blaming Ukraine for starting the war with Russia?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?